|
|
| Author |
Message |
avextraxjp
Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 303
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 12:07 pm Post subject: remove regisrty entries |
|
|
I'm looking for a program that could identify unused registry entries and remove them
what do you suggest? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
SoftStag

Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 1273 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard that Max Registry Cleaner is good, but I don't personally use registry cleaners. I've seen too many PCs that have been ruined by such software, and Windows XP is fairly good at managing the registry, unlike Windows 95, 98 and Me. _________________ Quality Rare Domain Names
"Microsoft programs are generally bug-free. If you visit the Microsoft hotline, you'll literally have to wait weeks if not months until someone calls in with a bug in one of our programs. 99.99% of calls turn out to be user mistakes. I know not a single less irrelevant reason for an update than bugfixes. The reasons for updates are to present more new features."
-- Bill Gates, on code stability, from Focus Magazine |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
avextraxjp
Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 303
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| any freeware? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoftStag

Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 1273 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ccleaner that I recommended to you in this thread has a registry cleaner built in, and it's feeware. _________________ Quality Rare Domain Names
"Microsoft programs are generally bug-free. If you visit the Microsoft hotline, you'll literally have to wait weeks if not months until someone calls in with a bug in one of our programs. 99.99% of calls turn out to be user mistakes. I know not a single less irrelevant reason for an update than bugfixes. The reasons for updates are to present more new features."
-- Bill Gates, on code stability, from Focus Magazine |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Steve

Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 115 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like good software. Thanks SoftStag, I'll take a look at that.  _________________ My Blog (just getting started with it)
Join my Vampire Army! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
avextraxjp
Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 303
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SoftStag wrote: | | I've heard that Max Registry Cleaner is good, but I don't personally use registry cleaners. I've seen too many PCs that have been ruined by such software, and Windows XP is fairly good at managing the registry, unlike Windows 95, 98 and Me. |
Does that mean WIN XP remove all unused registries? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SoftStag

Joined: 05 Feb 2006 Posts: 1273 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
XP doesn't remove any unused registries as such, it's just that it is generally better at managing the registry in that it leaves fewer unnecessary registry entries, and cleans up after uninstalls much better than previous operating systems. It is also affected much less by a 'bloated' registry, in that the PC won't slow down as much as previous operating systems did. _________________ Quality Rare Domain Names
"Microsoft programs are generally bug-free. If you visit the Microsoft hotline, you'll literally have to wait weeks if not months until someone calls in with a bug in one of our programs. 99.99% of calls turn out to be user mistakes. I know not a single less irrelevant reason for an update than bugfixes. The reasons for updates are to present more new features."
-- Bill Gates, on code stability, from Focus Magazine |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steve

Joined: 07 Feb 2006 Posts: 115 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ive been using my XP machine for years, and never cleaned the registry. I dont think it is necessary.  _________________ My Blog (just getting started with it)
Join my Vampire Army! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|